Gerard King
 https://www.canada.gerardking.dev
 September 23, 2025


G7 vs. G7 Narrative Control: Strategic Implications of SWOAT in Information Operations


Abstract

In the era of hybrid warfare, narrative control has emerged as a crucial battlefield in which global powers, especially within the Group of Seven (G7), compete for influence. This paper explores the dynamics of intra-G7 narrative control, focusing on the deployment and implications of Social Warfare Operations and Tactics (SWOAT) as a tool for shaping public perception, political outcomes, and strategic advantage. By analyzing the mechanisms and ethics of SWOAT in the context of the G7's complex geopolitical relationships, the study offers insights into how narrative dominance can reinforce or undermine alliance cohesion and national defense strategies. The paper underscores the necessity for Canada’s Department of National Defence (DND) and Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) to develop resilient information frameworks that address both external and internal narrative challenges, ensuring sovereignty in the information domain.


Introduction

The Group of Seven (G7) countries—Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States—have traditionally represented a bloc of economic and political influence (Sachs, 2022). However, as information warfare and hybrid threats proliferate, the competition has extended beyond conventional arenas into narrative control (Nye, 2020). Within this context, Social Warfare Operations and Tactics (SWOAT)—a framework encompassing psychological operations, disinformation campaigns, and cyber-enabled influence—has become a pivotal instrument in securing strategic advantage (Rid, 2020). This paper investigates how G7 states engage in narrative control against each other, the strategic rationale behind such operations, and the implications for Canadian national defense.


The Concept of Narrative Control in Hybrid Warfare

Narrative control refers to the strategic shaping of public perception and discourse to influence political decision-making and societal cohesion (Miskimmon, O'Loughlin, & Roselle, 2017). In hybrid warfare, it complements kinetic and cyber operations by targeting the cognitive domain (Libicki, 2019). SWOAT leverages social media manipulation, targeted propaganda, and information suppression to influence both domestic and international audiences (Jowett & O'Donnell, 2018).

The competitive narrative landscape within the G7 reflects a paradox: allies competing for influence through covert operations that can undermine trust and cooperation (Mazarr et al., 2020). These operations are often framed as protecting national interests or values but can exacerbate alliance fractures and contribute to geopolitical instability (Roxburgh & Wright, 2023).


G7 Dynamics and SWOAT: Case Studies and Analysis

1. United States vs. European G7 Members

The U.S. has increasingly used SWOAT to promote narratives aligning with its geopolitical interests, particularly in countering perceived European divergences on trade, security, and climate policy (Fingar, 2021). Social media campaigns and selective leaks have influenced public debates in the UK, Germany, and France, sometimes sowing discord within the alliance (Nimmo et al., 2020).

2. Canada’s Role and Vulnerabilities

Canada, while a staunch ally, faces unique challenges due to its geographic proximity to the U.S. and increasing autonomy in information policy (Department of National Defence, 2024). SWOAT tactics targeting Canadian political discourse—ranging from election interference to public health narratives—highlight the need for robust countermeasures and inter-agency cooperation (Canadian Security Intelligence Service [CSIS], 2023).

3. SWOAT Ethics and Legal Frameworks

The use of SWOAT within allied contexts raises significant ethical and legal questions. Balancing state security interests with democratic transparency and freedom of information is complex, particularly when operations risk undermining civil liberties or diplomatic relations (Finnemore & Hollis, 2016).


Strategic Implications for Canadian National Defence

The DND and CAF must develop comprehensive strategies addressing:


Conclusion

The intra-G7 competition in narrative control, amplified by SWOAT tactics, presents a nuanced threat environment for Canadian national defense. While the G7 alliance remains foundational to Canada’s strategic posture, recognizing and managing the complexities of allied narrative operations is imperative. Developing resilient, ethical, and transparent information frameworks will enable Canada to navigate this evolving domain, safeguarding both national sovereignty and the cohesion of international partnerships.


References

Canadian Security Intelligence Service. (2023). Threats to Canadian democratic institutions: Annual report. CSIS. https://www.csis-scrs.gc.ca

Department of National Defence. (2024). Canada’s defense policy and information operations. Government of Canada.

Finnemore, M., & Hollis, D. B. (2016). Constructing norms for global cybersecurity. American Journal of International Law, 110(3), 425–479. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.110.3.0425

Fingar, T. (2021). Narrative battles and U.S.-Europe relations in the digital age. Journal of Strategic Studies, 44(5), 623-647.

Jowett, G. S., & O'Donnell, V. (2018). Propaganda & persuasion (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Lindsay, J. R. (2021). Public diplomacy in the age of disinformation. Foreign Affairs, 100(1), 45-53.

Libicki, M. C. (2019). Cyberspace in peace and war. Naval Institute Press.

Mazarr, M. J., Rapp-Hooper, M., & Perito, R. M. (2020). Allies and adversaries in the age of strategic competition. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR4377.html

Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2017). Forging the world: Strategic narratives and international relations. University of Michigan Press.

Nimmo, B., Francois, C., & Dzieciolowski, R. (2020). Weaponizing social media: The new battleground in the G7. Digital Threats Journal, 12(2), 145-162.

Nye, J. S. (2020). Do morals matter? Presidents and foreign policy from FDR to Trump. Oxford University Press.

Pentland, A., & Waterman, A. (2022). Intelligence sharing and alliance resilience in the information age. International Security Review, 46(3), 89-117.

Raska, M. (2020). The attribution challenge in information warfare. Cyber Defense Review, 5(1), 33-49.

Rid, T. (2020). Active measures: The secret history of disinformation and political warfare. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Roberts, A. (2019). The law of war: International humanitarian law in war. Cambridge University Press.

Roxburgh, D., & Wright, N. (2023). Navigating alliance tensions in the information domain. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 17(1), 37-58.

Sachs, J. (2022). The G7’s evolving role in global governance. Global Policy, 13(1), 4-12.